Legal Opinion
People v. Haresign
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 28, 2017PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Oswego County Court (Donald E. Todd, J.), dated November 2, 2015. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court did not err in assessing 10 points based on defendant’s failure to accept responsibility.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. NoriegaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. KyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. DupuisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- People v. DupuisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- People v. TealAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- People v. TealAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- People v. WarnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025