Hickson v. State

I dissent from the majority decision affirming the conviction in this case. I agree with appellant’s argument that it was error to allow the State’s expert witness to give testimony stating, in effect, that in her opinion it was the appellant who took the money that the books showed was missing. See Ethridge v. State, 9 Ark. App. 111, 654 S.W.2d 595 (1983).