Legal Opinion

C. H. Reed & Co. v. Beall

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1869PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the Chancery Court of Tishomingo county. TIon. W. D. Bradford, chancellor. No State can pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts. Const. IT. S., art. 1, § 10; Const. Miss., art. 1, § 10. Appellants, on 4th September, 1865, obtained a license from the Board of Police of Tishomingo county, Miss., to retail vinous or spirituous liquors in the town of Corinth for twelve months from date.

Read the full summary

Error to the Chancery Court of Tishomingo county. TIon. W. D. Bradford, chancellor. No State can pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts. Const. IT. S., art. 1, § 10; Const. Miss., art. 1, § 10. Appellants, on 4th September, 1865, obtained a license from the Board of Police of Tishomingo county, Miss., to retail vinous or spirituous liquors in the town of Corinth for twelve months from date. Corinth had a population less than one thousand. The license was issued in accordance with the provisions and requirements of the Bev. Code, ch. 20, pp.…

1Opinion of the CourtShackelford, C. J.

The appellants filed their bill on the 15th day of June, 1867, in the Chancery Court of Tishomingo county.

The bill alleges, that on the 4th day of September, A.D. 1865, the appellants obtained a license to retail vinous and spirituous liquors in the town of Corinth in said county, a town *478of less than two thousand inhabitants; said license was issued by order of the board of police of said county, and that they paid for the same the sum of two hundred and two and a half dollars, and that it was for the term of twelve months.

That said license was issued under the provisions of the Revised Code,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  2. President of the Portland Bank v. ApthorpMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
  3. Ex Parte TillinghastSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  4. Higinbotham v. BurnetNew York Court of Chancery · 1821
  5. Lewis v. LuskMississippi Supreme Court · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. Bd. of Suprs. of Winston Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Coulson v. HarrisMississippi Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Decker v. McGowanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  4. Ford v. EasterlingMississippi Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API