Legal Opinion

Homer T. Barnett v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 18, 1969No. 18484_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether the District Court erred in dismissing the action on the ground that it had not been commenced within the period provided by the applicable statute of limitations. Plaintiff-appellant does not contest the application of Kentucky Revised Statute 413.140(d), which provides that an action for slander must be commenced within one year of the occurrence giving rise to the action. .However, as the District Judge pointed out in the memorandum filed with the order of dismissal, plaintiff-appellant attempts to avoid the consequences of that statute by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Northern Kentucky Telephone Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. William B. Lashlee, Jr. v. Morris E. SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  2. Caslin v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980
  3. Sitwell v. BurnetteDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1972
  4. Plummer v. SummeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984
  5. Toth v. LenkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API