Homer T. Barnett v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether the District Court erred in dismissing the action on the ground that it had not been commenced within the period provided by the applicable statute of limitations. Plaintiff-appellant does not contest the application of Kentucky Revised Statute 413.140(d), which provides that an action for slander must be commenced within one year of the occurrence giving rise to the action. .However, as the District Judge pointed out in the memorandum filed with the order of dismissal, plaintiff-appellant attempts to avoid the consequences of that statute by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Northern Kentucky Telephone Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
3Cited by7 opinions
- William B. Lashlee, Jr. v. Morris E. SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Caslin v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980
- Sitwell v. BurnetteDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1972
- Plummer v. SummeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984
- Toth v. LenkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.