Legal Opinion

Wright v. Wright

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 2003No. 32A01-0208-CV-293PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Gerald Franklin Wright ("Husband") appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to correct error. He presents two issues for our review, which we restate as:

1. Whether Husband properly served his motion to correct error on the trial court pursuant to Trial Rule 59.

2. Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it modified the terms of the parties' dissolution decree regarding Husband's visitation with his children.

We reverse and remand with instructions.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Husband and Wife, Kimberly Vanars-dale Wright, were married and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. HubbardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Sears Roebuck and Co. v. NoppertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Gregor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Unishops, Inc. v. May's Family Centers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Willie Jenkins v. Mary JenkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. East Chicago Police Department v. BynumIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Garner v. KovalakIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. F.M., Mother v. N.B., FatherIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Richard Troy Dunno v. Ronalee RasmussenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API