United States v. Barnum
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
RABY, Senior Judge:
Appellant asserts that he is entitled to a total of 138 days of administrative credit, because he was placed on 69 days of restriction tantamount to confinement.1 A close examination of the circumstances surrounding appellant’s restraint reveals that he was placed in a modified form of restriction to the company area and although some attributes of his restriction were severe,2 appellant’s pretrial restraint, when measured using the test formulated in United States v. Smith, 20 M.J. 528 (A.C.M.R.), petition denied, 21 M.J. 169 (C.M.A.1985), does not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. SuzukiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. BlairU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986
- United States v. HendonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. SmithU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. FreemanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. HowardU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. HancockU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993