Legal Opinion

United States v. Barnum

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 11, 1987No. ACMR 8600541PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

RABY, Senior Judge:

Appellant asserts that he is entitled to a total of 138 days of administrative credit, because he was placed on 69 days of restriction tantamount to confinement.1 A close examination of the circumstances surrounding appellant’s restraint reveals that he was placed in a modified form of restriction to the company area and although some attributes of his restriction were severe,2 appellant’s pretrial restraint, when measured using the test formulated in United States v. Smith, 20 M.J. 528 (A.C.M.R.), petition denied, 21 M.J. 169 (C.M.A.1985), does not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. SuzukiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. BlairU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986
  3. United States v. HendonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  4. United States v. SmithU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  5. United States v. FreemanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HowardU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1987
  2. United States v. HancockU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API