Fairrow v. Marves

| WOODARD, J.,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion.

Ms. King’s heirs provided evidence, the inferences of which indicate that, more likely than not, it was her separate funds, not his, which were responsible for the property’s purchase. As our supreme court has instructed, “[Fjactual inferences reasonably drawn from the evidence must *1240be construed in favor of the party opposing the motion [for summary judgment], and all doubt must be resolved in the opponent’s favor.” 1 (Emphasis added.) Thus, the inferences from Ms. King’s evidence should preclude summary judgment for…