Legal Opinion

State v. Adderly

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 1, 1992No. 91-1295PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR REQUEST TO CERTIFY QUESTION OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE

2Per curiam

We deny appellee’s motion for rehearing, but grant his motion to certify a question of great public importance. Accordingly, as this court did in State v. Scates, 585 So.2d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), we certify the following question to be of great public importance:

MAY A TRIAL COURT PROPERLY DEPART FROM THE MINIMUM MANDATORY PROVISIONS OF SECTION *557893.13(l)(e), FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF SECTION 397.12, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989)?

DELL, GARRETT and FARMER, JJ., concur.

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. ScatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Adderly v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992