Legal Opinion

Peggy Goldman-Frankie v. Richard Austin

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1984No. 82-1747PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan granting the motion of plaintiffs-appellees for summary judgment and ordering that the name of plaintiff-appellee Peggy Goldman-Frankie appear on the November 2, 1982 ballot as an independent candidate for a seat on the Michigan State Board of Education.

The underlying facts to this controversy are not in dispute. Goldman-Frankie was intent upon becoming an independent candidate for a seat on the Michigan Board of Education in the 1982 election. There were two major obstacles to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Council of Alternative Political Parties v. HooksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Zielasko v. OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. Cromer v. South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  4. Zielasko v. The State Of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Cripps v. Seneca County Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API