Legal Opinion

James L. Enochs, United States District Director of Internal Revenue for the District of Mississippi v. Kenneth Muse and Winnie Muse

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 25, 1959No. 17667PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Circuit Judge.

The appellees, Kenneth Muse and Winnie Muse, are husband and wife. They will be referred to in this opinion as the taxpayers. They filed within the prescribed time a joint income tax return for the year 1956 and paid the tax as shown by the return to be owing. Thereafter the District Director determined that the taxpayers had underpaid estimated tax under the provisions of Section 6654 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. 1 The Director made an assessment in the amount of S204.23 and demanded payment. The taxpayers brought suit seeking an injunction against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ralph C. Granquist, District Director of Internal Revenue for the District of Oregon v. Margaret HacklemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  2. Newsom v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  3. Muse v. EnochsDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1958

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hannan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
  2. Shaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Estate of Di Rezza v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  4. F.B. Blansett and Ethel Blansett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  5. Charles F. Johnston, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API