Cann v. Cann
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
334 So.2d 325 (1976)
Tedford J. CANN, Appellant,
v.
Margery M. CANN, Appellee.
No. Z-254.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 30, 1976.
Roy M. Kinsey, Jr., of Kinsey, Troxel & Mann, Pensacola, for appellant.
G. Robert Barron of Smith, Grimsley, Barron & Remington, Fort Walton Beach, for appellee.
BOYER, Chief Judge.
The final judgment entered in the dissolution of marriage action from whence this appeal is taken required the husband, appellant here, to pay alimony the amount of which is not in controversy. The sole issue is whether the alimony should be permanent or rehabilitative.
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lee v. LeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Aldrich v. AldrichSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
- Thigpen v. ThigpenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Calligarich v. CalligarichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Eakin v. EakinSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Pfohl v. PfohlDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
- Storer v. StorerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Marriage of Otis v. OtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.