Legal Opinion

Rucker v. Dixon

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 3, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Mississippi Chancery Court; Edward D. Robertson, Chancellor; Actual possession of a portion of the land in controversy was constructive possession of the whole tract described in the deed, and adverse possession thereof by appellants for two years gave title to the whole. 71 Ark. 122; lb. 393.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCueeoch, J.

This was a suit in equity brought by Mary C. Dixon against A. G. Rucker, E. E. Rucker, A. H. Gress and Lizzie Phillips to cancel and remove, as a cloud upon the plaintiff’s title to a quarter section of land in Mississippi County, a donation deed executed by the State Eand Commissioner to one Crabtree, under whom the defendants claim title by mesne conveyances. The forfeiture for taxes upon which the State’s donation deed is based is alleged to be void for the reasons set forth in the complaint. The defendants filed separate answers pleading adverse occupancy of the land under the donation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sparks v. FarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
  2. Boynton v. AshabrannerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ElderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. HillisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. Pitts v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. Baum v. YarberrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  5. Jones v. Pond & Decker Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API