Legal Opinion

United States v. Arnold Bernstein S. S. Line

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 20, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

On February 19, 1938, the Secretary of Labor imposed a fine on the defendant in-the sum of $1,000 for its failure to detain, an alien seaman on board the S. S. Eberstein, pursuant to Section 20(a) of the-Immigration Act of 1924, Title 8 U.S.C.A.. § 167(a), until he had been inspected by the Immigration authorities. The entire-matter was reconsidered by the Board of' Review on March 10, 1938. The Board adhered to its original decision and subsequently this ruling was followed by the-Secretary of Labor.

This action is brought to recover -the fine imposed. On consent of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. The Chinese Exclusion CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Chae Chan Ping v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Osaka Shosen Kaisha Line v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Savelis v. VlachosDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1955
  2. United States v. Seaboard Surety Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1956
  3. United States v. American President Lines, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API