Hackett, Recr. v. Kripke
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
This is an appeal on questions of law. The record shows that there were two separate issues before the trial court. One, which arose upon the petition, was the rate of interest chargeable on a promissory note; the other, as to set-off presented by the cross-petition, was based upon a claimed contract of a national bank, the payee of the note sued upon, to repurchase for the purchase price certain bonds sold by it to one of the makers of the note.
Trial by jury was waived and the court found for the defendants on both issues, and the plaintiff appealed. The facts and discussion of these matters…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Hitchcock v. GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Logan County National Bank v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Awotin v. Atlas Exchange Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Marfield v. Cincinnati, D. & T. Traction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- The Ltv Corporation v. Gulf States Steel, Inc. Of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Toledo Trust Co. v. Peoples Banking Co. (In Re Hartley)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1985
- McMillen v. Willys Sales Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1963
- Gustin v. Sun Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- State v. StallingsSuperior Court of Delaware · 2018