Legal Opinion

Arcadia Hosiery Co. v. Fine

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 1, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

Pursuant to rule 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice, summary judgment may be awarded when “ an answer is served.” This rule specifically provides for the statements by affidavit of the plaintiff or any other persons having knowledge of the facts verifying the cause of action. From a mere reading of this rale, we gather that this disposition of an action involves a judicial examination of the issues sought to be raised and also of the evidence submitted to the court. The affidavit upon the original motion for summary judgment here involved incorporates certain evidentiary matters which are put…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mora v. Great Western InsuranceThe Superior Court of New York City · 1863
  2. People ex rel. Kempner v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Pape v. TomoorAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910
  4. Yorke Waist Co. v. RainbowCity of New York Municipal Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. GrafCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931
  2. Egelhof v. EganAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API