Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hoyt

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided May 6, 1946No. Civil Action No. 541Published

1Opinion of the Court

CONNOR, District Judge.

This matter came on for hearing on the plaintiff’s motion to remand on the ground that the petition for removal had not been filed within the time fixed by the statute. It is conceded that the petition was not filed within the first four days of the term and that Rule 23 of the Superior Court requires that a plea in abatement must be filed within that period.

The removal statute- (28 U.S.C.A. § 72) provides that the petition for removal may be filed in the state court “at the time, or any time before the defendant is required by the laws of the State or the rule of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Wofford v. HopkinsDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API