Legal Opinion

Brodie v. Snider

King George County Circuit Court

Decided June 22, 1993No. Case No. (Chancery) 90-36Published

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge James W. Haley, Jr.

In this partition proceeding, the pinion issue is whether or not the parcel can be conveniently partitioned in kind. The principles here applicable concerning partition are well established.

Equity has no inherent jurisdiction to order the sale of land for the purpose of partition. “Prima Facie each party is entitled to actual partition . . . .”

Cauthorn v. Cauthorn, 196 Va. 614, 619, 85 S.E.2d 256, 259 (1955).

At common law courts of equity were empowered to partition land in kind; however, until the adoption of Code §§ 8.01-81 through 8.01-93 and their predecessors,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Seawell v. SeawellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Cauthorn v. CauthornSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  3. Straley v. FisherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  4. Leonard v. BoswellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  5. Sensabaugh v. SensabaughSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API