Comstock v. White
New York Supreme Court
Motion to dissolve injunction. The facts will sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Suthebland, Justice.
There is nothing in the papers submitted on this motion, to show that the defendants, White and Moore, or either of them, individually or as partners, ever had in fact, the exclusive right'to compound, manufacture and sell, the pills called, “Dr. Morse’s Indian Boot Pillsalthough it does appear from these papers that White and Moore, by the yellow labels or wrappers, used by them around the pill boxes, prior to the partnership between the plaintiffs and the defendant White, represented and advertised Moore as the proprietor of the pills, and stated that none could be…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Gilman v. HunnewellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Rogers & Brother v. RogersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
- Hoeft v. SeamanThe Superior Court of New York City · 1874
- Weston v. KetchamThe Superior Court of New York City · 1875