Legal Opinion

Hughry v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 25, 1974No. 73-3259PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff recovered damages from defendant railroad company arising out of his having been injured by a train in a switching yard. Being dissatisfied with the amount of the award, he claims error in' two particulars and seeks a new trial.

As to the first claim of error, it is not altogether clear that the court instructed the jury that plaintiff was a trespasser in that the instructions to this effect were immediately followed by another instruction that left the issue to the jury. Even assuming the jury was instructed that plaintiff was a trespasser, we find no error. The evidence was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Dickerson v. Illinois Central RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Murray v. Louisville & Nashville R.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matthew Hughry v. The Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Road Company, No. 73-3259 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API