Legal Opinion

Ringsaker v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2003No. 20020335PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] The North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau (“Bureau”) appealed from a district court judgment requiring the Bureau to accept Robert L. Ringsaker’s claim and provide benefits. We conclude the district court reasonably decided to sanction the Bureau for its tardy filing of a brief, but conclude the court abused its discretion in the sanction imposed. We reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings.

I

[¶ 2] On February 3, 2000, Ringsaker filed a claim for workers compensation benefits for a work-related shoulder injury. The Bureau denied the claim. After a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Willard Rushing and Patricia Rushing v. Kansas City Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Rosario-Diaz v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  3. Rueckert v. RueckertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Kopp v. KoppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Center Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Viscito v. ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Ringsaker v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Viscito v. ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. C & K Consulting v. Ward County Board of Commissioners (consol w/ 20190313North Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Peterson v. ZieglerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API