Ingram v. Cincinnati, F. & S. E. R. R.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 64. — ACTION BY O. B. INGRAM AGAINST THE CINCINNATI, FLEMINGSBURG & SOUTHEASTERN R. R. CO. AND OTHERS TO HAVE SAID RAILROAD COMPANY PLACED IN THE HANDS OF A RECEIVER. Appeal from Fleming Circuit Court. James P. Hakbeson, Circuit Judge. Motion by plaintiff for receiver overruled and he appeals POINTS AND AUTHORITIES. 1. Receiver’s duties.
Read the full summary
CASE 64. — ACTION BY O. B. INGRAM AGAINST THE CINCINNATI, FLEMINGSBURG & SOUTHEASTERN R. R. CO. AND OTHERS TO HAVE SAID RAILROAD COMPANY PLACED IN THE HANDS OF A RECEIVER. Appeal from Fleming Circuit Court. James P. Hakbeson, Circuit Judge. Motion by plaintiff for receiver overruled and he appeals POINTS AND AUTHORITIES. 1. Receiver’s duties. (Alderson on Receivers, section 2, p. 3; section. 4, p. 7; section 515, p. 701.) 2. The duty of the court in the appointment of a receiver. (Columbia Finance & Trust Co. ,v. Morgan, etc., 19 Ky. Law Rep., 1761; Reban v. Furham, 21 Ky. Law Rep., 17; Ind.…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Hobson
Overruling motion.
O. B. Ingram on November 6, 1907, recovered a judgment for $4,000 against the Covington, Flemingsburg & Ashland Railroad Company. Execution was issued on the judgment and returned “No property found.” On November 11, 1907, he filed this suit, against the Codington, Flemingsburg & Ashland Railroad Company, the Cincinnati, Flemingsburg & Southeastern Railroad Company, and the Columbia Finance & Trust- Company, in which he alleged that the first company had sold out to the second its railway and property, and that as a part of the price the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- L. & N. R. R. v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stratton & Terstegge Co. v. MeriwetherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Harvey v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Wathen v. WathenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919