Legal Opinion

Michael Canfield v. Game Warden Chappel, Individually and as a Game Warden for the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 29, 1987No. 86-1627PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POLITZ, Circuit Judge:

Invoking constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and pendent state law claims, Michael Canfield filed suit against Wayne Chappel, a Game Warden of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. The issue presented to the jury was whether Game Warden Chappel had probable cause to arrest Canfield for failing to display a hunting license while hunting outside the county of his residence. The jury concluded that probable cause for the warrantless arrest did not exist and returned a verdict in favor of Canfield. The district court assessed attorney’s fees. A motion for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fields v. City of South HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  2. Fields v. City of South Houston, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. C-1 v. City of Horn LakeDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API