Tinney v. Vittur
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Twenty-Eighth Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Charles; Prentice E. Edrington, Judge. Action by Mrs. W. H. Tinney against Mrs. A. Vittur. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff, and from a judgment on defendant’s petition to enjoin the sale of certain property seized, which judgment held one lot exempt and one riot exempt, defendant (plaintiff in injunction) appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.
Plaintiff obtained judgment against Mrs. A. Vittur for the sum of $54.60 with legal interest from judicial demand.
Plaintiff caused the property of the defendant and of her children to be seized.
The sheriff advertised the property for sale by public auction.
Mrs. Vittur, a feme sole, widow of August Vittur, in her petition for an injunction alleged that the property is her homestead; averred: That seven children, still minors, are the issue of her marriage with August Vittur. That they are dependent upon her for support and maintenance. That she and her children have no property other than the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lyons v. AndrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- Speyrer v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- Maxwell v. RoachSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- Harrelson v. WebbSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Reynolds v. HullSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
3Cited by9 opinions
- Succession of BurnsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Doucet v. FontenotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Succession of WhiteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Mansfield v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- W. T. Baker & Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.