Legal Opinion

South Shore Utility Co. v. Railroad Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

It is undisputed that the board of trustees of the village of Combined Locks, on the 18th day of January, 1929, granted a franchise to the South Shore Utility Company and that this franchise is the only one ever granted by the village. It is apparently conceded by the respondents that the franchise so granted is valid unless at the time it was granted there was in operation in the village, under an indeterminate permit, a public utility engaged in similar service. Sec. 196.50, Stats. 1927, provides in part as follows :

“No license, permit or franchise shall be granted to any person,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Gas & Electric Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  2. City of Plymouth v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Milwaukee v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Weyauwega Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Town of Barton v. Division of Hearings & AppealsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  4. City of Milwaukee v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API