Legal Opinion
Morse v. Carpenter
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 20, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error to the district court for Perkins county. Tried below before Church, J. cited: Repine v. McPherson, 2 Kan., 340; Dutton v. Blob-son, 7 Id., 96; Barry v. Hovey, 30 O. St., 348; Newlove v. Woodward, 9 Neb., 504; McMillan v. Rowe, 15 Id., 523; Haskins v. Bank, 12 Id., 39. cited: Haskins v, Bank, 12 Neb., 41; Degering v. Flick, 14 Id., 449: Rawalt v. Brewer, 16 Id., 446.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This action was brought before a justice of the peace to recover the sum of $107.50, claimed to be due from the plaintiff in error to the defendant in error. A summons was duly issued as follows:
“The state of Nebraska, Perkins county, to John D. Dayton, special constable of said county:
“You are hereby commanded to summon Jesse E. Morse to appear before me, Burtin E. Lee, a justice of the peace, at my office in Madrid, Perkins county, on the 15th *225day of April, 1889, at 1 o’clock in the afternoon of said day, to answer the action of Friend Carpenter, wherein he has sued you for money due him…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Haskins v. Citizens BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by1 opinion
- North Pacific Cycle Co. v. ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1894