Legal Opinion

Person v. Leary.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Petitiou to rehear granted.

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

This is a rehearing of the case reported in 126 N. C., 504. It has given us much trouble, because we are unwilling to overrule, or even materially modify, the essential principles governing the recognition of foreign receivers laid down in this case when here before. This trouble might have been avoided if the plaintiffs had followed the suggestions rather pointedly given in Kruger v. Bank, 123 N. C., 16. We have repeatedly recognized the right of foreign receivers, under the law of comity, to sue in this State. In Insurance Co. v. Edwards, 124 N. C., 116, 121, this Court says: “At this stage…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ins. Co. v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Kruger v. Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Person v. . LearySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Patton v. W. M. Ritter Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Brinson v. . MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Sharpe v. . SowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API