Legal Opinion

State v. Franks

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 22, 1922No. A-3876PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatson, J.

(after stating the facts as above). Error is assigned as follows:

The court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the information and in rendering judgment thereon in favor of the defendant.

The state contends that the information herein is sufficient to charge the crime of harboring criminals as defined by our Criminal Code, and that it (1) substantially conforms to the Code of Criminal Procedure of the State of Oklahoma; (2) that it states facts sufficient to constitute a public offense; (3) that it does not attempt to charge more than one offense in the same count; and (4) that it is neither…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Baysinger v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  2. State v. GrayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Dickson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. State v. DennisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. McGhee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API