Legal Opinion

Blunt v. Brigety (In re Blunt)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

Decided November 16, 1987No. Bankruptcy No. 85-1049-BK-J-11; Adv. No. 86-189PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

GEORGE L. PROCTOR, Bankruptcy Judge.

The plaintiff has filed motion for summary final judgment. The United States has opposed that motion and has filed a cross-motion for summary judgment against the plaintiff. Defendants Reuben E. Brigety, Reuben E. Brigety, M.D., P.A., and Thomas W. Brooks, III, have joined the plaintiff in opposition to the United States and have filed their own cross-motion for summary judgment against the United States. All of the parties agree that for purposes of these motions, there are no genuine issues of material facts.

FINDINGS…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Hull v. Maryland Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  3. Chatlos v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  4. Florida Power & Light Company v. RaderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  5. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. LawsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Prowse v. Walters, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API