Johnson v. Aetna Insurance Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Chief Judge.
1. Three written statements made and subscribed to by each of the defendants were admitted in evidence over their objection. All of the statements contain admissions against their interests. The objection made was that the admis sions were made because of the results of lie detector tests. It appears from the transcript that while each of the defendants took lie detector examinations, the results of the examinations were never offered in evidence. It has been held in Salisbury v. State, 221 Ga. 718 (146 SE2d 776) that the results of a lie detector examination are not…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Salisbury v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stack v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Famber v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.