Legal Opinion

(PC) McCoy v. Kelso

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 20, 2021No. 1:12-cv-00983Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY, ) Case No.: 1:12-cv-000983-AWI-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ) 13 v. ) AMEND THE JUDGMENT 14 STRONACH, et al., ) (ECF No. 302) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) 17 Plaintiff Joseph Raymond McCoy is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On October 15, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial under Federal Rule of Civil 20 Procedure 59. (ECF No. 302.) 21 The Court may grant reconsideration under…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Joseph Wood, III v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Kirk Rishor v. Bob FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Michael Thompson v. Walter Kelly, Superintendent, Attica Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API