Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 13, 1975No. 58714PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries occasioned by the alleged negligence of the defendant, Chicago Transit Authority, (hereinafter “C.T.A.”) in the operation of one of its vehicles. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $30,000 and judgment was entered thereon. Defendant filed a post-trial motion inter alia for a new trial which was granted by the trial court. Plaintiff then filed a petition for leave to appeal which was aUowed in this court. The sole question on appeal is whether the trial court’s action in granting defendant’s motion for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hulke v. International Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  2. Finley v. New York Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Biel v. WolffAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  4. Dailey v. HillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  5. Doerr v. PalmAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spankroy v. AleskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. Skelton v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Tedrowe v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Cummings v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Ryon v. JaviorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API