Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cadogan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 2, 1982No. 2068PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions, and that the lower court erred in imposing separate sentences for burglary and criminal trespass. We find that the evidence was sufficient, but that the sentences for burglary and criminal trespass merged and, accordingly, vacate the judgment of sentence for criminal trespass and affirm the others.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, criminal trespass, and conspiracy arising from an incident on November 21, 1979. Following denial of post-trial motions, the lower court sentenced him to concurrent…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. RouxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. TateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. HorvathSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. FlynnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. VazquezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. BoettcherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API