Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Hurt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 6, 2004No. COA03-26Published

1DissentWynn, Judge

Because I conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion by finding as an aggravating factor that Defendant joined with another person in the commission of the offense, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion of my well-learned colleagues.

The State is required to prove the existence of an aggravating factor by a preponderance of the evidence. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.16(a) (2003). In addition to the aggravating factors listed in section 15A-1340.16(d) of the General Statutes, the trial court in its discretion may find “[a]ny other aggravating factor reasonably related to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ManningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. ManningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API