Legal Opinion

Riverside Mills v. Brooks

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1909No. 1447PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action for damages, from city court of Bichmond county— Judge Eve. September 28, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

Brooks sued the Biverside Mills, alleging, in substance, that tbe defendant directed the overhead shafting, in one of the loom rooms of its factory, removed for the purpose of making some changes therein;- that in order for the workmen to reach this shafting, a temporary scaffold was provided, consisting of three work-horses or benches placed in a line, a short distance apart, upon which was placed a flooring of planks; that the plaintiff had been assigned by the defendant to work in the picker room, and on the day of the injury was called therefrom and directed to take his place on this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Worlds v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Ludd v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Daniel v. ForsythSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Bolden v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  5. Quinn v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Threlkeld v. AnthonyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. Terry Shipbuilding Corp. v. DuBoseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  3. City of Atlanta v. HaganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API