Legal Opinion

James D. Crow, D/B/A Comco Leasing Company v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 17, 1980No. 78-3264PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff/appellant, James D. Crow, doing business as Comeo Leasing Company, brought suit against the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for an alleged conversion of certain furniture leased by Crow to tenants of an apartment complex owned by HUD. The district court dismissed HUD as a defendant, but the plaintiff asserts his cause of action against the United States. The court dismissed Crow’s claim, holding that he had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies in that he had not presented his claim in writing for a sum certain. We hold that Crow adequately presented…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gary L. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Hilario Molinar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Anna Mae R. Henderson v. United States of America, Anne Marie Henderson, by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Anna Marie R. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  2. Luis Mora v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  3. Mary E. Tucker v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  4. Willard D. Douglas and Violet A. Douglas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. Robert Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API