Legal Opinion
Satinder Singh
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California
Decided January 3, 2024No. 23-22540Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 FOR PUBLICATION 3 4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 In re ) Case No. 23-22540-E-13 ) Docket Control No. RLL-1 9 SATINDER SINGH, ) ) 10 Debtor. ) ) 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND DECISION 12 SUSTAINING OBJECTION TO EXEMPTION CLAIMED IN LIQUOR LICENSE 13 Creditor Placerville Investment Group, LLC (“Creditor”), objects to Satinder Singh’s 14 (“Debtor”) claimed exemption under California law in a liquor license.1 Creditor argues that a liquor 15 license is not a tool of the trade and should not be exempt under California Code of Civil Procedure 16 §…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Schwab v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.