Legal Opinion

Horn & Hardart Baking Co. v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 21, 1940No. 646 CivilPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELSH, District Judge.

This case presents a single issue as to whether a dividend paid by the Automat Company to Plorn & Hardart Baking Company on June 15, 1929, was in the nature of a liquidating dividend or one declared in the ordinary course of a go"ing business. The facts and circumstances are set forth in stipulations constituting the sole evidence, and from which we find the following pertinent facts: '

The plaintiff seeks to recover $1,515.75 with interest,' representing a portion of its income tax for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1930, a claim for refund having been made by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kennemer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  2. Guild v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
  3. Holmby Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  4. Holmby Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  5. Kennemer v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beretta v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  2. Donald L. Mains and Joyce G. Mains v. United States of America, F. E. Gooding v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. Herbert A. Nieman & Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  4. Herbert A. Nieman & Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  5. Hewgley v. Stone Tax Com'r.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API