Taylor v. Taylor
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeid, J.
The decree in this contested divorce ease was rendered in favor of plaintiff on the. ground of extreme cruelty. Defendant appeals.
■ Defendant claims that the testimony was insufficient to support a decree, that the plaintiff’s allegations were not proven by a preponderance of the evidence, that the decree was rendered on the grounds of public policy, and that plaintiff failed to prove the domicile of plaintiff, as the result of which the court vías without jurisdiction. This being a chancery hearing, we hear the case de novo.
Plaintiff produced convincing testimony to establish the fact that…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Mark v. MarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1947