Young v. Hill

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Richardson —

Affirming.

This is the second appeal of this case. See Young et al. v. Hill et al., 247 Ky. 672, 57 S. W. (2d) 470.

All issues were determined on the first appeal, except the question of priority of Hill’s attachment lien and the mortgages of J. P. Young and the Charleston Trust Company, on three oil tanks, six pump jacks, six shackel lines, various lead lines, gasoline engine, and all of its connections with power lines, various quantities of casing, tubing, and sucker rods at six wells drilled on the Skaggs’ lease. Hill’s attachment was levied on these…