Legal Opinion

Trout Brook Co. v. Willow River Power Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The Willow river is a stream twenty-five miles long, rising in the northeasterly corner of St. Croix *619county, running in an irregular generally southwesterly direction to New Richmond, and from thence southwesterly to Hudson, where it discharges into the St. Croix river, or Lake St. Croix, as it is sometimes called, at the city of Hudson. At the time in question the New Richmond Roller Mills in the city of New Richmond owned and operated a small dam with a drainage area of one hundred fifty-eight square miles. It is the first dam located on the river and is eight or nine miles upstream from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. City of HudsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Allen v. City of Chippewa FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. YarbroughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Geuder, Paeschke & Frey Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Cobb v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hoosac Tunnel & Wilmington Railroad v. New England Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Baldwin Processing Co. v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Town of Wausaukee v. LauermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API