Legal Opinion
CONSOL. GRAIN AND BARGE CO. v. Flowers Transp.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided March 31, 1982No. 79-692 C(3)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
538 F.Supp. 65 (1982)
CONSOLIDATED GRAIN AND BARGE COMPANY, Plaintiff,
v.
FLOWERS TRANSPORTATION, INC., Defendant.
No. 79-692 C(3).
United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.
March 31, 1982.
Husch, Eppenberger, Donohue, Elson & Cornfield, Alan B. Hoffman, Joseph P. Conran, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.
Thompson & Mitchell, Raymond L. Massey, St. Louis, Mo., Ernest Lane, III, Greenville, Miss., for defendant.
MEMORANDUM
FILIPPINE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court for a decision on the merits of plaintiff's complaint, following trial to the Court. The complaint seeks recovery of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Stevens v. the White CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mid-America Transportation Company, Inc. v. National Marine Service, Inc., and M/v National Progress, Her Engines,boilers, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Mid-America Transportation Co. v. Rose Barge Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Mid-American Transportation Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Cargo Carriers, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Columbia Brick Works, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- SCNO Barge Lines, Inc. v. Sun Transp. Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1984
- Agri-Trans Corp. v. Peavey Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1983
- Columbia Brick Works, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Espinoza-EspinozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982