Legal Opinion
Travelers Indemnity Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 7, 1976No. 75-1208PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
This appeal comes before us for consideration of the narrow issue of what meaning is to be ascribed to the words “associated” and “affiliated” as used in the waiver of subrogation clause of the insurance policy involved herein. The court below, D.C., 393 F.Supp. 79, relying on Or.Rev.Stat. 744.165, 1 held that a federal government agency was “associated” with the insured within the meaning of this policy provision:
All right of subrogation is hereby waived under this policy against any corporation, firm, individual or other entity to which or to whom coverage is afforded…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re Marine Sulphur Transport Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Willis W. Ritter v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Sturgis National Bank v. Maryland Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Marine Transit Corp. v. Northwestern Fire & Marine Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. John F. Cawrse Lumber Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. SchillingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Allstate Insurance v. RoelfsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1987
- Los Angeles News Service Robert Tur v. CBS Broadcasting, Inc. Courtroom Television NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Sentry Select Insurance v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Frances L. Power, Individually, and as Administratrix of the Estate of Marilyn K. Power v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.