Legal Opinion

State v. Drury

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 2011No. ED 96754PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KURT S. ODENWALD, Chief Judge.

Introduction

The State of Missouri (State) appeals from the trial court’s order suppressing evidence related to the arrest of Kerri Drury (Drury) for driving while intoxicated. The trial court found that Drury was detained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, ordered the evidence suppressed, and dismissed the charges against her. After reviewing the record, we find that Drury was not seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Drury’s original detention was constitutionally permissible because it was initiated for the purpose of officer safety at the scene of an…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State of Missouri v. Travis LovettMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. RamirezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  4. State of Missouri v. Stephen D. WrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API