Legal Opinion

Ludey v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 9, 1925No. D-360PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Judge

This case comes on to be heard on the joint motion of the attorneys for plaintiff and defendant to amend the findings of fact heretofore made, and a stipulation of additional facts has been filed by said attorneys with the motion to amend.

The case as originally heard was on a stipulation of facts. The court concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to recover in some amount, but was unable to determine from the facts then stipulated what the amount should be, and entered an order remanding the case for a stipulation or evidence as to the amount of the judgment that should be rendered for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Stratton's Independence, Ltd. v. HowbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. United States v. FlannerySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Goodrich v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McKinney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API