Legal Opinion

Revenue Cabinet v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 9, 2005No. Nos. 2004-CA-001692-MR, 2004-CA-001772-MRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAISLEY, Senior Judge.

This is an appeal by the Revenue Cabinet, now known as the Department of Revenue (“Revenue”), from an opinion and order of the Franklin Circuit Court ruling that it did not have enough information to determine whether all or part of a “Reserve for Product Liability” account held by the Babcock and Wilcox Company (B & W) is “surplus” and therefore taxable “capital” pursuant to Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) 136.070. Revenue contends that B & W failed to preserve for review the issue of whether the account is capital, and that even if it had, the entire account…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bob Hook Chevrolet Isuzu, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Transportation CabinetKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  2. National-Standard Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Collins v. Kentucky Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  4. Stoner Creek Stud, Inc. v. Revenue Cabinet CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1987
  5. Kroger Co. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Westminster Falcon/Trinity L.L.P. v. Chong Shin, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API