Tucker v. Tucker
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The master reported that the charge of adultery was not proved. The proof of guilt was the record of conviction of the defendant and co-respondent, in the Essex special sessions, on a joint allegation of adultery; the defendant's conviction was after trial; the co-respondent's, on his plea of guilty. They were sentenced to a term in jail.
It is the rule that a conviction in a criminal prosecution is not admissible in evidence in a purely civil action to establish the truth of the facts on which it is rendered, but the reasons for excluding such testimony in the trial of contested issues do not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stewart v. StewartNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1921
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1826
- Randall v. RandallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1826
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sorbello v. ManginoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
- AMER. POLICYHOLDERS'INS. CO. v. PortaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- State v. ConteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990