Walker v. State

Maurice Walker appeals the trial court’s order revoking his probation and claims that several of the trial court’s findings rest upon legally insufficient grounds. The State properly concedes that one of the grounds supporting the probation violation order is insufficient but argues that the remaining violations being attacked on appeal were legally sufficient. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand.

Walker previously pled no contest to several crimes and was sentenced to three years of probation. While out on probation, he was suspected of being involved in another crime and a…