Lipscomb v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Dillard, Judge.
Following a trial by jury, Phillip David Lipscomb was convicted of one count of child molestation. On appeal, Lipscomb contends that (1) the evidence was insufficient, (2) the trial court erred in denying a motion to strike a juror for cause, and (3) the trial court erred in denying a motion for mistrial when the State during closing arguments made remarks that he alleges were improper. For the reasons set forth infra, we affirm.
Viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, 1 the record reflects that on the evening of April 14, 2010, Lipscomb was playing video games…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Arrington v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Pearson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Westbrooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- DELONG v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- CRUSSELLE v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sowell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Whorton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Pendleton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- MEDDINGS v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.