Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Arlene Otis v. City of Chicago

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 18, 1994No. 92-1342Published

1Concurring in the judgmentRovner, Circuit Judge

Although I am convinced that we should accept jurisdiction over this appeal and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Otis’ case, I write separately to address two aspects of the court’s opinion with which I cannot agree. First, I believe the court’s discussion of the allegedly conflicting lines of authority in this circuit exaggerates the extent of any differences in orn-eases. And second, I am uncomfortable with the court’s comments on the practice of dismissing eases with leave to reinstate in the Northern District of Illinois.

A

I am less sanguine than the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Charles Adams v. Lever Brothers CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. In the Matter of William Behrens and Carolyn Behrens, Debtors. Appeal of Woodhaven AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. William B. Kaplan v. Merrill ZennerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Grantham v. McGraw-Edison Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  5. James A. Schoenberger, Jr. v. Ronald P. OselkaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API