Legal Opinion

Wilmering v. Lexington Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 1984No. Nos. 47131, 47153PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Plaintiffs, as statutory trustees of the Cotton Blossom Corporation and individually, sued Lexington Insurance Company, Lawton-Byrne-Bruner Insurance Agency and Stoehner Security, Inc. to recover losses sustained by the corporation and damages allegedly sustained by the individuals as a result of the sinking of the Cotton Blossom in the Mississippi River. The jury found for Lexington on plaintiffs’ claim based on a marine insurance policy. That claim was in two counts, the first seeking recovery under the policy and the second seeking recovery for vexatious refusal to pay.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Fowler v. Park Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. Saskatchewan Government Insurance Office v. Spot Pack, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  4. Tropical Marine Products, Inc. v. Birmingham Fire Insurance Company of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  5. General Mutual Insurance v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1853

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Busey Truck Equipment, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Bucksaw Resort, L.L.C. v. MehrtensMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Cotton Blossom Corp., Inc. v. Lexington Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1985
  4. Boulevard RE Holdings LLC v. Mixon Insurance Agency Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
  5. Mount Vernon Specialty Insurance Company v. Chippewa Loft LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API